top of page
Subscribe to Our Monthly Newsletter! 

Super! We'll keep you in the loop!

By Xenia Shih Bion

https://www.chcf.org/blog/governor-newsom-appoints-first-ever-surgeon-general-california/



ree

About a year ago, Nadine Burke Harris, MD, MPH, published her first book, The Deepest Well: Healing the Long-Term Effects of Childhood Adversity. The book chronicles her journey from San Francisco pediatrician to pioneer in the field of research on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). On February 11, Burke Harris will take another momentous step on her career journey: She will be sworn in as California’s first-ever surgeon general.


Governor Gavin Newsom announced the appointment of Burke Harris on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, describing her as a “pediatrician, entrepreneur, and nonprofit CEO” who has “dedicated her professional career to understanding the link between adverse childhood experiences and toxic stress in children, and the effect both have on future health outcomes.” As surgeon general, Burke Harris will “urge policymakers at every level of government and leaders across the state to consider the social determinants of health, especially for children.”


On the campaign trail, Newsom spoke often about the need to invest in early childhood education and health care, and he has worked quickly to propose early childhood investments in his initial acts as governor. During his inauguration speech he said, “California is our home. In our home, every child should be loved, fed, and safe. … We will support parents so they can give their kids the love and care they need, especially in those critical early years when so much development occurs.”


The Heart of the Issue


Burke Harris’ research has centered on the impact of trauma on children in early childhood. In 2008, she was working at the Bayview Child Health Center, treating children and adolescents who were growing up in one of San Francisco’s poorest neighborhoods. As she recounted a few years later to Paul Tough in The New Yorker, the clinic was making significant headway on health issues like asthma that are common among low-income children. Despite that, “I felt like we weren’t actually addressing the roots of the disparity,” she told Tough.


Then a colleague gave her a journal article about an ACE study conducted by Kaiser Permanente San Diego. The study of more than 17,000 Kaiser HMO members found that the higher an individual’s ACE score, the worse his or her health. There was a stunning range of negative health outcomes for which this correlation was found ­— likelihood of having an alcohol use disorder, of injecting drugs, of having diabetes, heart disease, or cancer ­— just to name a few. Lead author Vincent J. Felitti, MD, summarized, “The ACE study reveals a powerful relation between our emotional experiences as children and our adult emotional health, physical health, and major causes of mortality in the United States.”


The study was a revelation to Burke Harris and changed her approach to treating young patients in her clinic. In an interview with the Center for Youth Wellness, which she founded in 2013, she said, “When I first started my research into toxic stress, I had no idea that childhood adversity could change the way our DNA was read and transcribed. I never learned about that in medical school.” But she went on to pave the way for important local and national efforts to combat childhood trauma, leading the Bay Area Research Consortium on Toxic Stress and Health and serving as a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ National Advisory Board for Screening, among other appointments.


“We couldn’t be more proud of Nadine’s appointment as Surgeon General of California,” said Mary Pang, board chair of Center for Youth Wellness. “Nadine now takes the power of her voice and vision to Sacramento, working alongside policymakers to effect change and creating a healthier California for all of us.”


How California Is Caring for Those with Trauma


There is already some work underway at the state level to address childhood trauma. Former governor Jerry Brown signed two childhood trauma bills into law in late 2017. According to an ACEs Connection blog post, AB 340 “creates a statewide advisory body to review current screening protocols and make recommendations about how to improve trauma screening for children” in the Medi-Cal program. AB 1340 “requires the Medical Board of California to consider including in its continuing education requirements a course in integrating mental and physical health care in primary care settings, especially as it pertains to early identification of mental health issues and exposure to trauma in children and young adults and their appropriate care and treatment.”


Additionally, Medi-Cal has taken steps in recent years to focus on ACEs and trauma-informed care. For example, Medi-Cal’s Whole Person Care pilot program (PDF) in 26 counties coordinates health, behavioral health, and social services to improve vulnerable people’s health outcomes (CHCF is supporting the pilots’ Learning Collaborative). Some Whole Person Care pilots, including one in Marin County, use a trauma-informed approach to understand and address individuals’ complex needs.

Sandra R. Hernández, MD, president and CEO of the California Health Care Foundation, spoke at the Center for Youth Wellness’ 2018 ACEs Conference about the importance of health coverage for providing people who have experienced trauma with appropriate care. She praised Governor Newsom’s appointment of Burke Harris, saying, “Dr. Burke Harris is recognized nationally as a pioneer and advocate for understanding childhood trauma and building a foundation for lifelong health. I can’t imagine a better person for this role.”


ree
Governor-elect Gavin Newsom takes the oath of office during his inauguration ceremony in Sacramento, California, on Monday, January 7th, 2019. Photo: Gabrielle Lurie, The Chronicle

The new governor promises to help expand pre-kindergarten classes, make the second year of community college education free for full-time students, and is proposing up to six months of paid leave from work for parents of newborn children. Less directly, the governor has hinted at attempting a single-payer healthcare system.


Welcome to the big seat in the capitol, governor Newsom! We are excited to see what you can do for California, and what you can do for the midwives who serve the women and families in this great state!


In the wake of the ProPublica and NPR series “Lost Mothers,” the U.S. House of Representatives unanimously approved a bill to fund state committees to review and investigate deaths of expectant and new mothers.

ree
In the wake of the ProPublica and NPR series “Lost Mothers,” the U.S. House of Representatives unanimously approved a bill to fund state committees to review and investigate deaths of expectant and new mothers.

Update, Dec. 13, 2018 at 8:15 p.m. ET: On Thursday evening, the Senate unanimously passed its version of the Preventing Maternal Deaths Act, sending it to the president to sign.


Congress moved a big step closer on Tuesday toward addressing one of the most fundamental problems underlying the maternal mortality crisis in the United States: the shortage of reliable data about what kills American mothers.

The House of Representatives unanimously approved H.R. 1318, the Preventing Maternal Deaths Act, to help states improve how they track and investigate deaths of expectant and new mothers.

The bipartisan bill authorizes $12 million a year in new funds for five years — an unprecedented level of federal support — for states to create review committees tasked with identifying maternal deaths, analyzing the factors that contributed to those deaths and translating the lessons into policy changes. Roughly two-thirds of states have such panels, but the legislation specifically allocates federal funds for the first time and sets out guidelines they must meet to receive those grants.

“We’re going to investigate every single [death] because these moms are worth it,” Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Wash., the lead sponsor, testified at a hearing in September. Lisa Hollier, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, called the legislation a “landmark.”


The full Senate still needs to give its approval, with only a few days to act before the end of the current session. Senators have already authorized the necessary funding, in budget legislation that passed this year.


As ProPublica and NPR have documented in the “Lost Mothers” series, maternal deaths have been rising in the U.S. in recent years even as they declined in other wealthy countries. More than 700 women die each year in America from causes related to pregnancy or childbirth, while at least 50,000 suffer life-threatening complications. Nationally, black women have a maternal mortality rate three to four times higher than that of white women. At least 60 percent of maternal deaths are preventable.

Among the reasons the U.S. has fallen behind other countries, one stands out: government failures to collect accurate data and to study maternal deaths and near-deaths to understand how they might be prevented.

State maternal mortality review committees can play a key role in this process, public health experts say. They are particularly critical to understanding and narrowing racial disparities in outcomes. They have uncovered the surprising fact that cardiac-related issues are the leading cause of death for mothers and that the majority of deaths don’t occur during childbirth but in the days and weeks after birth.

But many committees have little or no funding and rely on volunteers to do their work. They publish reports irregularly and, in some cases, do not address the issue of preventability at all. As a result, many maternal deaths have gone miscategorized or uncounted, and many researchers and clinicians have formed a distorted picture of why mothers die, often putting the blame unfairly on women themselves instead of medical providers, hospital systems and other factors.

The House bill says that reviews are “essential” for “developing prevention efforts and quality improvement and quality control programs.” It adds, “The United States must identify at-risk populations and understand how to support them to make pregnancy and the postpartum period safer.” The guidelines for receiving federal funding dictate how committees should be made up and how evaluators should find and count deaths.

Members of Congress have introduced other bills in recent years to try to prod states to establish review committees or strengthen existing ones. But maternal mortality wasn’t seen as a serious problem, and the legislation was usually associated with one political party, Democrats. The bills did not gain traction.

The “Lost Mothers” series and a deluge of other media reports changed that, helping to create an unprecedented sense of urgency, maternal health advocates say. “I don’t think we would be as far as we are without that,” said Kathryn Schubert, chief advocacy officer for the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, whose members are doctors specializing in high-risk pregnancies. “Every day, I get a call from somebody saying: ‘Oh my God, this is a real problem. We have to do something,’ because they’ve read it in the news.”


The news stories have also inspired mothers who have survived life-threatening complications and relatives of women who died. “It became the call to arms,” said Eleni Tsigas, head of the Preeclampsia Foundation and a co-founder of a new coalition of maternal health organizations, MoMMA’s Voice.


The nonstop advocacy by patients and doctors — and even groups like March of Dimes, which has traditionally been more focused on infant health — has been effective. “Twelve million dollars [per year] was more than we originally had in the legislation,” Schubert said. “That never happens. … They put in money that we didn’t even dream of asking for at this point.”

The other important factor in the legislation’s success has been bipartisanship: The House bill and its Senate companion, S-1112, were introduced by Republicans as well as Democrats, and both have acquired many supporters along the way. Even so, despite having some 190 co-sponsors, the House bill remained stalled in committee for most of the past two years, coming unstuck in recent weeks after a lobbying blitz by medical groups and patient advocates.


Several more-sweeping maternal-related bills are pending on Capitol Hill, and just last week, the Senate approved a bill aimed at reducing chronic shortages of maternity care providers in some parts of the country, sending it to the president to sign. Meanwhile, lawmakers outside Washington have also been active — at least six states have passed bills in the past year establishing or strengthening their maternal mortality review panels.


Read the original article here

cnmalogo_edited.jpg

The California Nurse Midwife Association (CNMA) is the professional organization representing Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives in the state of California.

CNMA IS AN AFFILIATE OF

Screen Shot 2018-12-16 at 8.04_edited.jp

CONTACTS

 

Questions on continuing education courses, including documentation for tuition reimbursement? Contact CONTINUING ED

 

Questions related to midwifery policy and practice? Contact our LEGISLATIVE TEAM

 

Membership questions? Contact MEMBERSHIP

General questions not covered above? Contact info@cnma.org

Follow us:

  • facebook
  • instagram
  • twitter
bottom of page